Today, John E. Jones III ruled that a Pennsylvania school board's policy of teaching intelligent design in high school biology class is unconstitutional because intelligent design is clearly a religious idea that advances "a particular version of Christianity." The crux of the article concerns the book "Pandas" which explains to students that intelligent design suggests there are two kinds of creation, natural and intelligent. Intelligent creation must then be supernatural.
THE CASE The particular Christian organization behind Intelligent Design is "Christian Fundamentalism" which pointedly teaches its theological doctines within intelligent design.

Please note the fundamentalist. He is the minister bending over.
The Judge determined from the evidence and confirmed by IDs "Wedge document" who the backers of ID are and the Christian intent of their efforts. Their stategy is to eventually replace the natural with their brand of supernatural. Christian fundamentalism is a part of the new Christian orthodoxy. They propose as all Othodox Chistians do the inerrancy of the Bible....a laughable standard to defend.
Let it be known that there are a world of Christians not aligned with these folks who do not go before the courts of this land as wolves in sheeps clothing. We are direct, instead of devious; we are certainly in your face about the truth.
The truth held by all the real sheep this Christmas season is that Christ is the Creator and as Creator, He set the rules; And the rules are science. Those who do not believe this message, we leave you to believe what you will. But, please do not confuse us with those who use slight of hand and deceit in the courts, putting a stain on the rest of us.
Being an experienced certified public school principal, I have come to know public school law. To the extent that intelligent design "is clearly... a particular version of Christianity" or any other religion, and where a school board gives preference to it, the case is made against intelligent design.
Try to understand that Judge Jones can be right in stopping the the favored influence of the Christian Fundamentalists and at the same time uphold the US Constitution in this matter.
Again:
THE CASE